Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF vs Iron Mountain Inc — how do they compare? Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF trades at $43.5, while Iron Mountain Inc trades at $122.41 (market cap $36.44B). The key difference: Iron Mountain Inc pays a 2.82% dividend while Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF pays none, and Iron Mountain Inc is trading nearer its 52-week high, Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF nearer its low. Which is the better fit depends on your goals.
| AAAU | IRM | |
|---|---|---|
Sector | Commodities - Metals/Agriculture | Real Estate |
52-Week High | $53.21 | $133.06 |
52-Week Low | $32.74 | $78.86 |
Market Cap | — | $36.44B |
Enterprise Value | — | $55.85B |
Dividend Yield | — | 2.82% |
Trailing returns across standard periods
AAAU tracks the price of gold bullion by holding physical gold bars in secure vaults. Managed by Goldman Sachs, this ETF offers a cost-effective way to gain direct exposure to gold without the logistical challenges of storage or insurance.
Read more on AAAU →Iron Mountain Inc is a record management services provider. The firm is organized as a REIT. Most of its revenue comes from its storage business, with the rest coming from value-added services. The firm primarily caters to enterprise clients in developed markets. Its business segments include Global RIM Business
Read more on IRM →