Streamflow vs Zircuit — how do they compare? Streamflow trades at Rp144.83 (market cap Rp38,3M, Rp1,17M 24h volume), while Zircuit trades at Rp18.52 (market cap Rp113,72M, Rp48,13M 24h volume). The key difference: Zircuit is far larger — about 3× Streamflow's market cap, and Streamflow's supply is capped (254,5M / 1B STREAM (26%)) while Zircuit's keeps growing. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Streamflow for 28 Days and Zircuit for 15 Days on average.
| STREAM | ZRC | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | Rp38,3M | Rp113,72M |
Volume (24h) | Rp1,17M | Rp48,13M |
Circulating Supply | 254,5M / 1B STREAM (26%) | 5,9B ZRC |
Typical Hold Time | 28 Days | 15 Days |
Streamflow provides secure, user-friendly, and robust token infrastructure to create and distribute tokens across their entire lifecycle—from launch to maturity. By solving incentive misalignment, Streamflow ensures sustainable token economies.
Read more on STREAM →Zircuit is an AI-powered blockchain designed for secure and automated financial transactions. As a fully EVM-compatible zero-knowledge rollup, Zircuit integrates advanced AI, zero-knowledge proofs, and a robust infrastructure to provide exceptional safety, performance, and scalability. Every transaction is secured at the sequencer level by AI models, ensuring a highly safe environment for both users and developers. Tailored for internet-scale applications, Zircuit reduces gas fees and enhances transaction speed, enabling the full potential of Web3 while maintaining comprehensive protection.
Read more on ZRC →