Stader vs WalletConnect — how do they compare? Stader trades at Rp1,844 (market cap Rp130,78M, Rp11,57M 24h volume), while WalletConnect trades at Rp610.65 (market cap Rp265,19M, Rp100,17M 24h volume). The key difference: WalletConnect is far larger — about 2× Stader's market cap, and Stader's circulating supply is 70,8M / 120M SD (59%) versus 434,3M / 1B WCT (44%) for WalletConnect. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Stader for 13 Days and WalletConnect for 24 Days on average.
| SD | WCT | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | Rp130,78M | Rp265,19M |
Volume (24h) | Rp11,57M | Rp100,17M |
Circulating Supply | 70,8M / 120M SD (59%) | 434,3M / 1B WCT (44%) |
Typical Hold Time | 13 Days | 24 Days |
Stader is developing staking middleware for various PoS networks, offering modular smart contracts for third-party solutions. In the short term, it will launch contracts on blockchains like Terra and Ethereum to support yield farming and Gaming. Long-term, Stader will encourage third-party staking applications on its platform.
Read more on SD →WalletConnect Network is a decentralized platform that connects users to blockchain apps with ease and security. Powered by the WCT token, it supports a growing ecosystem and launches on Optimism for fast, secure performance.
Read more on WCT →