Compare Quack AI (Q) vs Venom (VENOM) Price & Performance
Price performance (Past 24H)
Key statistics
Key statistics
Quack AI vs Venom — how do they compare? Quack AI trades at Rp381.52 (market cap Rp1,67T, Rp36,8M 24h volume), while Venom trades at Rp333.71 (market cap Rp340,86M, Rp2,89M 24h volume). The key difference: Quack AI is far larger — about 4899.4× Venom's market cap, and Quack AI's circulating supply is 4,3B / 10B Q (44%) versus 988,9M / 8B VENOM (13%) for Venom. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Quack AI for 3 Days and Venom for 24 Days on average.
| Q | VENOM | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | Rp1,67T | Rp340,86M |
Volume (24h) | Rp36,8M | Rp2,89M |
Circulating Supply | 4,3B / 10B Q (44%) | 988,9M / 8B VENOM (13%) |
Typical Hold Time | 3 Days | 24 Days |
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Quack AI (Q) trades at Rp388.671 with a market cap of Rp1.7T, showing neutral technical signals overall. The token has a circulating supply of 4.3M out of 10M max supply (44% circulation rate) with an average hold time of 3 days. Moving averages indicate bullish momentum while oscillators remain neutral. Recent technical analysis shows the price is near the pivot point of Rp393 with support at Rp377 and resistance at Rp406.
The outlook remains balanced with technical indicators showing mixed signals. Key opportunities include the token's relatively low circulation rate suggesting potential future supply constraints. Major risks include typical crypto volatility and the neutral market sentiment that could lead to sideways trading in the short term.
VENOM displays limited market activity with a modest market cap of Rp340.86M and only 13% of its maximum 8M token supply in circulation. The asset shows minimal trading volume and network activity, with an average hold time of 24 days indicating cautious investor behavior. No recent protocol updates or significant ecosystem developments have been observed, suggesting stagnant project growth.
Overall outlook remains cautious due to limited liquidity and adoption. Key opportunity lies in potential future protocol development, while major risks include extreme volatility from low market depth and regulatory uncertainty in the crypto space. Investors should monitor for any signs of renewed developer activity or exchange listings.
Investor sentiment on Pluang
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
Investor sentiment on Pluang
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
No sentiment data available yet.
About Quack AI
Quack AI is a governance infrastructure that uses modular AI agents to automate and scale decision-making for DAOs and Web3 protocols. It analyzes proposals, delegates voting, and streamlines execution to improve participation and efficiency. Built with cross-chain standards like x402, it enables gasless, policy-aware governance actions across networks such as BNB Chain and Arbitrum.
Read more on Q →About Venom
Venom is a Layer 0 and Layer 1 network built on mesh technology that supports large-scale platforms like stablecoins and CBDCs. Its high scalability, speed, and low fees make it ideal for Web3 dApps, ensuring security and stability for high-load systems.
Read more on VENOM →
