Quack AI vs UMA — how do they compare? Quack AI trades at Rp388.51 (market cap Rp1,69T, Rp45,13M 24h volume), while UMA trades at Rp5,782 (market cap Rp524,04M, Rp28,75M 24h volume). The key difference: Quack AI is far larger — about 3224.9× UMA's market cap, and Quack AI's supply is capped (4,3B / 10B Q (44%)) while UMA's keeps growing. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Quack AI for 3 Days and UMA for 72 Days on average.
| Q | UMA | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | Rp1,69T | Rp524,04M |
Volume (24h) | Rp45,13M | Rp28,75M |
Circulating Supply | 4,3B / 10B Q (44%) | 90,6M UMA |
Typical Hold Time | 3 Days | 72 Days |
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
Quack AI is a governance infrastructure that uses modular AI agents to automate and scale decision-making for DAOs and Web3 protocols. It analyzes proposals, delegates voting, and streamlines execution to improve participation and efficiency. Built with cross-chain standards like x402, it enables gasless, policy-aware governance actions across networks such as BNB Chain and Arbitrum.
Read more on Q →UMA, or Universal Market Access, is a protocol for the creation of synthetic assets based on the Ethereum (ETH) blockchain. UMA allows counterparties to digitize and automate any real-world financial derivatives, such as futures, contracts for differences (CFDs) or total return swaps.
Read more on UMA →