Quack AI vs Render — how do they compare? Quack AI trades at Rp338.19 (market cap Rp1,43T, Rp67,65M 24h volume), while Render trades at Rp27,812 (market cap Rp14,3T, Rp314,96M 24h volume). The key difference: Render is far larger — about 10× Quack AI's market cap, and Quack AI's circulating supply is 4,2B / 10B Q (43%) versus 518,8M / 644,2M RENDER (81%) for Render. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Quack AI for 3 Days and Render for 46 Days on average.
| Q | RENDER | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | Rp1,43T | Rp14,3T |
Volume (24h) | Rp67,65M | Rp314,96M |
Circulating Supply | 4,2B / 10B Q (43%) | 518,8M / 644,2M RENDER (81%) |
Typical Hold Time | 3 Days | 46 Days |
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
Latest headlines on both assets
Quack AI is a governance infrastructure that uses modular AI agents to automate and scale decision-making for DAOs and Web3 protocols. It analyzes proposals, delegates voting, and streamlines execution to improve participation and efficiency. Built with cross-chain standards like x402, it enables gasless, policy-aware governance actions across networks such as BNB Chain and Arbitrum.
Read more on Q →The Render Network is the first decentralized GPU rendering platform, empowering artists to scale GPU rendering work on-demand to high performance GPU Nodes around the world. Through a blockchain marketplace for idle GPU compute, the network provides artists the ability to scale next generation rendering work at fractions of the cost and at orders of magnitude increases in speed when compared to the centralized GPU cloud.
Read more on RENDER →