Newton Protocol vs Turtle — how do they compare? Newton Protocol trades at Rp675.13 (market cap Rp210,84M, Rp36,31M 24h volume), while Turtle trades at Rp762.5 (market cap Rp117,11M, Rp16,07M 24h volume). The key difference: Newton Protocol is the larger of the two by market cap, and Newton Protocol's circulating supply is 312,8M / 1B NEWT (32%) versus 154,7M / 1B TURTLE (16%) for Turtle. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Newton Protocol for 26 Days and Turtle for 12 Days on average.
| NEWT | TURTLE | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | Rp210,84M | Rp117,11M |
Volume (24h) | Rp36,31M | Rp16,07M |
Circulating Supply | 312,8M / 1B NEWT (32%) | 154,7M / 1B TURTLE (16%) |
Typical Hold Time | 26 Days | 12 Days |
The Newton Protocol serves as a verifiable automation layer for on-chain finance, enabling users to delegate complex, cross-chain actions to AI agents while ensuring that each step adheres to user-DeFined guidelines through cryptographic guarantees. It combines smart accounts, such as ERC-4337 and EIP-7702, to allow for detailed delegation, along with trusted execution environment (TEE) attestations and zero-knowledge proofs (ZKPs) to verify the correctness of every off-chain decision. The ultimate aim is to transform automation into a trust-minimized framework, thereby facilitating agentic finance across multiple blockchains.
Read more on NEWT →Turtle aligns incentives between protocols and liquidity providers to surface unique yield opportunities. Its non-custodial system integrates with APIs and audited smart contracts to track liquidity flows and distribute rewards transparently. Turtle also offers advisory services for protocols seeking efficient liquidity incentives.
Read more on TURTLE →