Newton Protocol vs Treehouse — how do they compare? Newton Protocol trades at Rp673.34 (market cap Rp210,67M, Rp37,38M 24h volume), while Treehouse trades at Rp607.26 (market cap Rp94,86M, Rp41,93M 24h volume). The key difference: Newton Protocol is far larger — about 2.2× Treehouse's market cap, and Newton Protocol's circulating supply is 312,8M / 1B NEWT (32%) versus 156,1M / 1B TREE (16%) for Treehouse. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Newton Protocol for 26 Days and Treehouse for 19 Days on average.
| NEWT | TREE | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | Rp210,67M | Rp94,86M |
Volume (24h) | Rp37,38M | Rp41,93M |
Circulating Supply | 312,8M / 1B NEWT (32%) | 156,1M / 1B TREE (16%) |
Typical Hold Time | 26 Days | 19 Days |
The Newton Protocol serves as a verifiable automation layer for on-chain finance, enabling users to delegate complex, cross-chain actions to AI agents while ensuring that each step adheres to user-DeFined guidelines through cryptographic guarantees. It combines smart accounts, such as ERC-4337 and EIP-7702, to allow for detailed delegation, along with trusted execution environment (TEE) attestations and zero-knowledge proofs (ZKPs) to verify the correctness of every off-chain decision. The ultimate aim is to transform automation into a trust-minimized framework, thereby facilitating agentic finance across multiple blockchains.
Read more on NEWT →TREE is the native token of Treehouse, a Web3 platform focused on decentralized community engagement and ecosystem growth. It powers governance, rewards, and participation across Treehouse’s network of applications and services.
Read more on TREE →