Newton Protocol vs SONIC SVM — how do they compare? Newton Protocol trades at Rp674.21 (market cap Rp210,71M, Rp34,88M 24h volume), while SONIC SVM trades at Rp312.49 (market cap Rp231,76M, Rp14,04M 24h volume). The key difference: Newton Protocol and SONIC SVM are close in size by market cap, and Newton Protocol's supply is capped (312,8M / 1B NEWT (32%)) while SONIC SVM's keeps growing. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Newton Protocol for 26 Days and SONIC SVM for 20 Days on average.
| NEWT | SONIC | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | Rp210,71M | Rp231,76M |
Volume (24h) | Rp34,88M | Rp14,04M |
Circulating Supply | 312,8M / 1B NEWT (32%) | 740,4M SONIC |
Typical Hold Time | 26 Days | 20 Days |
The Newton Protocol serves as a verifiable automation layer for on-chain finance, enabling users to delegate complex, cross-chain actions to AI agents while ensuring that each step adheres to user-DeFined guidelines through cryptographic guarantees. It combines smart accounts, such as ERC-4337 and EIP-7702, to allow for detailed delegation, along with trusted execution environment (TEE) attestations and zero-knowledge proofs (ZKPs) to verify the correctness of every off-chain decision. The ultimate aim is to transform automation into a trust-minimized framework, thereby facilitating agentic finance across multiple blockchains.
Read more on NEWT →Sonic is the first SVM-based network extension on Solana, built for games and applications. It powers a Web3 social app layer designed to onboard the next billion users. Sonic is built with HyperGrid, a framework for managing optimistic Solana rollups.
Read more on SONIC →