Moca Network vs Streamflow — how do they compare? Moca Network trades at Rp157.07 (market cap Rp662,11M, Rp71,64M 24h volume), while Streamflow trades at Rp173.02 (market cap Rp43,9M, Rp1,37M 24h volume). The key difference: Moca Network is far larger — about 15.1× Streamflow's market cap, and Moca Network's circulating supply is 4,2B / 8,9B MOCA (48%) versus 252,7M / 1B STREAM (26%) for Streamflow. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Moca Network for 20 Days and Streamflow for 26 Days on average.
| MOCA | STREAM | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | Rp662,11M | Rp43,9M |
Volume (24h) | Rp71,64M | Rp1,37M |
Circulating Supply | 4,2B / 8,9B MOCA (48%) | 252,7M / 1B STREAM (26%) |
Typical Hold Time | 20 Days | 26 Days |
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
Moca Network is developing a chain-agnostic digital identity infrastructure for the open internet, allowing users to have one universal account for their assets, identity, and reputation across various ecosystems. With direct access to a portfolio of over 540 companies through Animoca Brands, Moca Network can reach more than 700 million potential users.
Read more on MOCA →Streamflow provides secure, user-friendly, and robust token infrastructure to create and distribute tokens across their entire lifecycle—from launch to maturity. By solving incentive misalignment, Streamflow ensures sustainable token economies.
Read more on STREAM →