Treasure vs Neon EVM — how do they compare? Treasure trades at Rp714.24 (market cap Rp240,55M, Rp28,27M 24h volume), while Neon EVM trades at Rp249.86 (market cap Rp60,01M, Rp2,07M 24h volume). The key difference: Treasure is far larger — about 4× Neon EVM's market cap, and Neon EVM's supply is capped (239,5M / 1B NEON (24%)) while Treasure's keeps growing. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Treasure for 14 Days and Neon EVM for 19 Days on average.
| MAGIC | NEON | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | Rp240,55M | Rp60,01M |
Volume (24h) | Rp28,27M | Rp2,07M |
Circulating Supply | 337,1M MAGIC | 239,5M / 1B NEON (24%) |
Typical Hold Time | 14 Days | 19 Days |
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
Treasure is a decentralized gaming platform serving as a foundation for next-generation games. Launched in 2021, it operates on the ZK Stack by ZKsync, an Ethereum Layer 2 scaling solution, and is powered by its native token, $MAGIC.
Read more on MAGIC →Neon EVM is a smart contract platform on Solana, which uses a proof-of-history consensus for added security. Although it faces occasional downtimes, solutions are expected in six months. With over 200 projects lined up for launch, including notable Ethereum-based ones like Curve and Sobal, Neon EVM aims to enhance interoperability and integrate with major Ethereum tools in the future.
Read more on NEON →