Treasure vs Manta Network — how do they compare? Treasure trades at Rp714.24 (market cap Rp240,55M, Rp28,27M 24h volume), while Manta Network trades at Rp1,019 (market cap Rp486,1M, Rp35,73M 24h volume). The key difference: Manta Network is far larger — about 2× Treasure's market cap, and Treasure's circulating supply is 337,1M MAGIC versus 478,1M MANTA for Manta Network. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Treasure for 14 Days and Manta Network for 120 Days on average.
| MAGIC | MANTA | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | Rp240,55M | Rp486,1M |
Volume (24h) | Rp28,27M | Rp35,73M |
Circulating Supply | 337,1M MAGIC | 478,1M MANTA |
Typical Hold Time | 14 Days | 120 Days |
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
Treasure is a decentralized gaming platform serving as a foundation for next-generation games. Launched in 2021, it operates on the ZK Stack by ZKsync, an Ethereum Layer 2 scaling solution, and is powered by its native token, $MAGIC.
Read more on MAGIC →Manta Network is the modular ecosystem for Web3 that enables users to build and deploy any Solidity-based decentralized applications on Manta and leverage its technology stack to deliver faster transaction speeds than an L1 and lower gas cost than an L2. Their main products include Manta Pacific, a scalable L2 solution with low gas fees, and Universal Circuits, a library for developers to integrate ZK-enabled contracts. They also offer non-invasive compliance solutions and aim to build a diverse ecosystem of applications.
Read more on MANTA →