Izumi Finance vs Turtle — how do they compare? Izumi Finance trades at Rp26.85 (market cap Rp32,06M, Rp254,85jt 24h volume), while Turtle trades at Rp751.75 (market cap Rp116,21M, Rp15,98M 24h volume). The key difference: Turtle is far larger — about 3.6× Izumi Finance's market cap, and Izumi Finance's circulating supply is 787,4M / 2B IZI (40%) versus 154,7M / 1B TURTLE (16%) for Turtle. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Izumi Finance for 11 Days and Turtle for 12 Days on average.
| IZI | TURTLE | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | Rp32,06M | Rp116,21M |
Volume (24h) | Rp254,85jt | Rp15,98M |
Circulating Supply | 787,4M / 2B IZI (40%) | 154,7M / 1B TURTLE (16%) |
Typical Hold Time | 11 Days | 12 Days |
Izumi Finance provides Programmable Liquidity as a Service (LaaS) on Ethereum with Uniswap V3 and plans to expand to multiple chains with integrated DEXs. This service allows liquidity providers to earn extra liquidity mining rewards and trading fees. It also helps protocols attract and maintain liquidity effectively. Izumi improves incentive distribution through its LiquidBox, allowing rewards to be allocated within specific price ranges.
Read more on IZI →Turtle aligns incentives between protocols and liquidity providers to surface unique yield opportunities. Its non-custodial system integrates with APIs and audited smart contracts to track liquidity flows and distribute rewards transparently. Turtle also offers advisory services for protocols seeking efficient liquidity incentives.
Read more on TURTLE →