Impossible Cloud Network vs Turtle — how do they compare? Impossible Cloud Network trades at Rp2,830 (market cap Rp715,49M, Rp47,45M 24h volume), while Turtle trades at Rp610.48 (market cap Rp94,3M, Rp34,78M 24h volume). The key difference: Impossible Cloud Network is far larger — about 7.6× Turtle's market cap, and Impossible Cloud Network's circulating supply is 253M / 700M ICNT (37%) versus 154,7M / 1B TURTLE (16%) for Turtle. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Impossible Cloud Network for 3 Days and Turtle for 11 Days on average.
| ICNT | TURTLE | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | Rp715,49M | Rp94,3M |
Volume (24h) | Rp47,45M | Rp34,78M |
Circulating Supply | 253M / 700M ICNT (37%) | 154,7M / 1B TURTLE (16%) |
Typical Hold Time | 3 Days | 11 Days |
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
Impossible Cloud Network (ICN) is a decentralized infrastructure protocol supporting enterprise-grade cloud services. It provides permissionless access to distributed storage, compute, and networking resources.
Read more on ICNT →Turtle aligns incentives between protocols and liquidity providers to surface unique yield opportunities. Its non-custodial system integrates with APIs and audited smart contracts to track liquidity flows and distribute rewards transparently. Turtle also offers advisory services for protocols seeking efficient liquidity incentives.
Read more on TURTLE →