Compare Impossible Cloud Network (ICNT) vs Streamflow (STREAM) Price & Performance
Price performance (Past 24H)
Key statistics
Key statistics
Impossible Cloud Network vs Streamflow — how do they compare? Impossible Cloud Network trades at Rp2,847 (market cap Rp715,49M, Rp47,45M 24h volume), while Streamflow trades at Rp173.07 (market cap Rp43,9M, Rp1,37M 24h volume). The key difference: Impossible Cloud Network is far larger — about 16.3× Streamflow's market cap, and Impossible Cloud Network's circulating supply is 253M / 700M ICNT (37%) versus 252,7M / 1B STREAM (26%) for Streamflow. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Impossible Cloud Network for 3 Days and Streamflow for 26 Days on average.
| ICNT | STREAM | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | Rp715,49M | Rp43,9M |
Volume (24h) | Rp47,45M | Rp1,37M |
Circulating Supply | 253M / 700M ICNT (37%) | 252,7M / 1B STREAM (26%) |
Typical Hold Time | 3 Days | 26 Days |
Investor sentiment on Pluang
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
Investor sentiment on Pluang
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
About Impossible Cloud Network
Impossible Cloud Network (ICN) is a decentralized infrastructure protocol supporting enterprise-grade cloud services. It provides permissionless access to distributed storage, compute, and networking resources.
Read more on ICNT →About Streamflow
Streamflow provides secure, user-friendly, and robust token infrastructure to create and distribute tokens across their entire lifecycle—from launch to maturity. By solving incentive misalignment, Streamflow ensures sustainable token economies.
Read more on STREAM →
