Impossible Cloud Network vs Sentient — how do they compare? Impossible Cloud Network trades at Rp2,412 (market cap Rp609,48M, Rp13,52M 24h volume), while Sentient trades at Rp233.98 (market cap Rp1,69T, Rp125,57M 24h volume). The key difference: Sentient is far larger — about 2772.9× Impossible Cloud Network's market cap, and Impossible Cloud Network's supply is capped (253M / 700M ICNT (37%)) while Sentient's keeps growing. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Impossible Cloud Network for 4 Days and Sentient for 7 Days on average.
| ICNT | SENT | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | Rp609,48M | Rp1,69T |
Volume (24h) | Rp13,52M | Rp125,57M |
Circulating Supply | 253M / 700M ICNT (37%) | 7,2B SENT |
Typical Hold Time | 4 Days | 7 Days |
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
Impossible Cloud Network (ICN) is a decentralized infrastructure protocol supporting enterprise-grade cloud services. It provides permissionless access to distributed storage, compute, and networking resources.
Read more on ICNT →Sentient is a decentralized AI network building an open alternative to corporate-controlled AGI. Powered by the GRID—an integrated system of AI models, agents, and data accessible via Sentient Chat—the ecosystem is governed and secured by the SENT token, which enables staking, payments, and community-led governance with the majority of supply allocated to ecosystem growth.
Read more on SENT →