Impossible Cloud Network vs Polygon — how do they compare? Impossible Cloud Network trades at Rp2,393 (market cap Rp606,59M, Rp13,56M 24h volume), while Polygon trades at Rp1,310 (market cap Rp14,08T, Rp665,79M 24h volume). The key difference: Polygon is far larger — about 23211.7× Impossible Cloud Network's market cap, and Impossible Cloud Network's supply is capped (253M / 700M ICNT (37%)) while Polygon's keeps growing. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Impossible Cloud Network for 4 Days and Polygon for 71 Days on average.
| ICNT | POL | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | Rp606,59M | Rp14,08T |
Volume (24h) | Rp13,56M | Rp665,79M |
Circulating Supply | 253M / 700M ICNT (37%) | 10,7B POL |
Typical Hold Time | 4 Days | 71 Days |
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
Latest headlines on both assets
Impossible Cloud Network (ICN) is a decentralized infrastructure protocol supporting enterprise-grade cloud services. It provides permissionless access to distributed storage, compute, and networking resources.
Read more on ICNT →The Polygon Ecosystem Token serves as a utility token within the expansive Polygon network. This digital asset plays a crucial role in facilitating a wide range of operations and services across the Polygon ecosystem. Its primary functions include staking, where token holders can lock up their tokens as a form of security and in return, participate in the network's consensus mechanisms. This not only helps in securing the network but also rewards the stakeholders with additional tokens based on the amount staked.
Read more on POL →