Impossible Cloud Network vs MON — how do they compare? Impossible Cloud Network trades at Rp2,398 (market cap Rp607,88M, Rp13,3M 24h volume), while MON trades at Rp24.59 (market cap Rp18,31M, Rp1,36M 24h volume). The key difference: Impossible Cloud Network is far larger — about 33.2× MON's market cap, and Impossible Cloud Network's circulating supply is 253M / 700M ICNT (37%) versus 593,8M / 1B MONPRO (60%) for MON. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Impossible Cloud Network for 4 Days and MON for 16 Days on average.
| ICNT | MONPRO | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | Rp607,88M | Rp18,31M |
Volume (24h) | Rp13,3M | Rp1,36M |
Circulating Supply | 253M / 700M ICNT (37%) | 593,8M / 1B MONPRO (60%) |
Typical Hold Time | 4 Days | 16 Days |
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
No sentiment data available yet.
Impossible Cloud Network (ICN) is a decentralized infrastructure protocol supporting enterprise-grade cloud services. It provides permissionless access to distributed storage, compute, and networking resources.
Read more on ICNT →MON Protocol is a decentralized digital ecosystem leveraging MONPRO tokens and maintained by validators worldwide. It features a launchpool for user rewards and serves as a web3 platform for blockchain-native games and IPs. With in-house titles like Pixelmon Games and partnerships with top chains, MON Protocol engages a growing gaming community while MONPRO tokens enable governance, in-game utility, and rewards.
Read more on MONPRO →