Impossible Cloud Network vs Treasure — how do they compare? Impossible Cloud Network trades at Rp2,844 (market cap Rp715,49M, Rp47,45M 24h volume), while Treasure trades at Rp780.12 (market cap Rp260,53M, Rp41,92M 24h volume). The key difference: Impossible Cloud Network is far larger — about 2.7× Treasure's market cap, and Impossible Cloud Network's supply is capped (253M / 700M ICNT (37%)) while Treasure's keeps growing. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Impossible Cloud Network for 3 Days and Treasure for 13 Days on average.
| ICNT | MAGIC | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | Rp715,49M | Rp260,53M |
Volume (24h) | Rp47,45M | Rp41,92M |
Circulating Supply | 253M / 700M ICNT (37%) | 336,5M MAGIC |
Typical Hold Time | 3 Days | 13 Days |
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
Impossible Cloud Network (ICN) is a decentralized infrastructure protocol supporting enterprise-grade cloud services. It provides permissionless access to distributed storage, compute, and networking resources.
Read more on ICNT →Treasure is a decentralized gaming platform serving as a foundation for next-generation games. Launched in 2021, it operates on the ZK Stack by ZKsync, an Ethereum Layer 2 scaling solution, and is powered by its native token, $MAGIC.
Read more on MAGIC →