Impossible Cloud Network vs Kusama — how do they compare? Impossible Cloud Network trades at Rp2,864 (market cap Rp718,24M, Rp39,83M 24h volume), while Kusama trades at Rp59,816 (market cap Rp1,11T, Rp61,61M 24h volume). The key difference: Kusama is far larger — about 1545.4× Impossible Cloud Network's market cap, and Impossible Cloud Network's supply is capped (253M / 700M ICNT (37%)) while Kusama's keeps growing. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Impossible Cloud Network for 3 Days and Kusama for 77 Days on average.
| ICNT | KSM | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | Rp718,24M | Rp1,11T |
Volume (24h) | Rp39,83M | Rp61,61M |
Circulating Supply | 253M / 700M ICNT (37%) | 18,5M KSM |
Typical Hold Time | 3 Days | 77 Days |
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Impossible Cloud Network (ICNT) is currently trading at Rp2,830 with a bearish technical signal, as indicated by moving averages, though oscillators are neutral. The token is near its S1 support at Rp2,779, with key resistance at Rp3,051. Circulating supply is 253 million out of a max 700 million ICNT, with a low hold time of 3 days suggesting short-term trading. No recent news or major protocol updates were found.
Overall outlook is cautious due to bearish momentum and low liquidity. Opportunities include oversold RSI levels hinting at a potential bounce. Major risks involve high volatility, limited exchange depth, and regulatory uncertainty in crypto markets. Investors should monitor support levels closely.
No Aura AI signal available yet.
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
Impossible Cloud Network (ICN) is a decentralized infrastructure protocol supporting enterprise-grade cloud services. It provides permissionless access to distributed storage, compute, and networking resources.
Read more on ICNT →Kusama is an experimental version of Polkadot and built by the same team. It was designed to provide unprecedented interoperability and scalability for developers.
Read more on KSM →