Hyperliquid vs io.net — how do they compare? Hyperliquid trades at Rp1,023,620 (market cap Rp259,13T, Rp5,08T 24h volume), while io.net trades at Rp2,012 (market cap Rp775,67M, Rp386,55M 24h volume). The key difference: Hyperliquid is far larger — about 334072.5× io.net's market cap, and Hyperliquid's circulating supply is 252,6M / 952,7M HYPE (27%) versus 381,5M / 800M IO (48%) for io.net. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Hyperliquid for 36 Days and io.net for 34 Days on average.
| HYPE | IO | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | Rp259,13T | Rp775,67M |
Volume (24h) | Rp5,08T | Rp386,55M |
Circulating Supply | 252,6M / 952,7M HYPE (27%) | 381,5M / 800M IO (48%) |
Typical Hold Time | 36 Days | 34 Days |
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
Latest headlines on both assets
Hyperliquid is an advanced blockchain platform designed to improve the efficiency and performance of decentralized finance (DeFi) applications. It is built on a custom Layer 1 blockchain that has been specifically engineered for optimal scalability and speed. A key feature of its design is HyperBFT, a proprietary consensus mechanism that provides rapid transaction finality while ensuring high security standards.
Read more on HYPE →io.net, formerly known as ANTBIT, leverages a decentralized computing network powered by Solana and Aptos to provide machine learning engineers with access to distributed cloud clusters. It aims to address challenges like limited availability, poor choice, and high costs associated with accessing GPUs in the public cloud.
Read more on IO →