Huma Finance vs Anoma — how do they compare? Huma Finance trades at Rp352.68 (market cap Rp1,15T, Rp74,63M 24h volume), while Anoma trades at Rp200.44 (market cap Rp503,3M, Rp53,93M 24h volume). The key difference: Huma Finance is far larger — about 2284.9× Anoma's market cap, and Huma Finance's circulating supply is 3,3B / 10B HUMA (33%) versus 2,5B / 10B XAN (25%) for Anoma. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Huma Finance for 14 Days and Anoma for 4 Days on average.
| HUMA | XAN | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | Rp1,15T | Rp503,3M |
Volume (24h) | Rp74,63M | Rp53,93M |
Circulating Supply | 3,3B / 10B HUMA (33%) | 2,5B / 10B XAN (25%) |
Typical Hold Time | 14 Days | 4 Days |
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
Huma Finance is the first PayFi network that provides global payment financing with instant, on-demand liquidity—available anytime and anywhere. It enables payment institutions around the world to settle transactions 24/7 using stablecoins and on-chain liquidity. Huma supports a wide variety of PayFi use cases, including cross-border payments, credit card settlements, and trade finance, while also facilitating emerging solutions such as decentralized physical infrastructure network (DePIN) financing.
Read more on HUMA →Anoma is a decentralized operating system that enables developers to build a single app that can run on any blockchain. Its intent-centric architecture simplifies infrastructure complexity, improving development efficiency and user experience. Anoma supports a unified app layer that brings Web3 app functionality closer to Web2 usability.
Read more on XAN →