Huma Finance vs Streamflow — how do they compare? Huma Finance trades at Rp402.01 (market cap Rp1,3T, Rp124,99M 24h volume), while Streamflow trades at Rp173.23 (market cap Rp43,82M, Rp1,36M 24h volume). The key difference: Huma Finance is far larger — about 29666.8× Streamflow's market cap, and Huma Finance's circulating supply is 3,3B / 10B HUMA (33%) versus 252,7M / 1B STREAM (26%) for Streamflow. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Huma Finance for 13 Days and Streamflow for 26 Days on average.
| HUMA | STREAM | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | Rp1,3T | Rp43,82M |
Volume (24h) | Rp124,99M | Rp1,36M |
Circulating Supply | 3,3B / 10B HUMA (33%) | 252,7M / 1B STREAM (26%) |
Typical Hold Time | 13 Days | 26 Days |
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
Huma Finance is the first PayFi network that provides global payment financing with instant, on-demand liquidity—available anytime and anywhere. It enables payment institutions around the world to settle transactions 24/7 using stablecoins and on-chain liquidity. Huma supports a wide variety of PayFi use cases, including cross-border payments, credit card settlements, and trade finance, while also facilitating emerging solutions such as decentralized physical infrastructure network (DePIN) financing.
Read more on HUMA →Streamflow provides secure, user-friendly, and robust token infrastructure to create and distribute tokens across their entire lifecycle—from launch to maturity. By solving incentive misalignment, Streamflow ensures sustainable token economies.
Read more on STREAM →