Heima vs Oasys — how do they compare? Heima trades at Rp2,396 (market cap Rp193,84M, Rp293,43M 24h volume), while Oasys trades at Rp9.01 (market cap Rp62,29M, Rp2,09M 24h volume). The key difference: Heima is far larger — about 3.1× Oasys's market cap, and Heima's circulating supply is 81,5M / 100M HEI (82%) versus 6,7B / 10B OAS (68%) for Oasys. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Heima for 11 Days and Oasys for 18 Days on average.
| HEI | OAS | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | Rp193,84M | Rp62,29M |
Volume (24h) | Rp293,43M | Rp2,09M |
Circulating Supply | 81,5M / 100M HEI (82%) | 6,7B / 10B OAS (68%) |
Typical Hold Time | 11 Days | 18 Days |
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
HEI (Heima) is currently trading at Rp2,198.904 with a market cap of Rp179.25 million, showing bullish technical signals despite mixed moving averages. The token has a circulating supply of 81.5 million HEI (82% of max supply) with an average hold time of 11 days. Technical indicators show strong momentum with RSI_6 at 21.06 (oversold) and ADX readings above 66 indicating strong trend strength. Support levels are established at Rp1,831 (S3) to Rp2,087 (S1), with resistance at Rp2,343 (R1) to Rp2,600 (R3).
Overall outlook is cautiously optimistic with bullish oscillators supporting upward momentum, though bearish moving averages suggest near-term consolidation. Key opportunities include potential breakout above Rp2,241 pivot point, while risks include low liquidity and typical crypto volatility. Investors should monitor volume patterns and network adoption metrics for confirmation of sustained momentum.
Oasys (OAS) currently shows limited market activity with a market cap of Rp62.29M and 68% circulating supply. The token exhibits low trading volume and network activity, with an average hold time of 18 days suggesting moderate short-term holding patterns. No significant protocol updates or ecosystem developments have been reported recently, indicating stagnant project momentum.
Overall outlook remains cautious due to limited liquidity and network growth. Key opportunity lies in potential future ecosystem development, while major risks include low exchange liquidity, regulatory uncertainty, and limited adoption. Investors should monitor for any protocol upgrades or exchange listings that could improve market dynamics.
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
No sentiment data available yet.
As an evolution of the Litentry Network, the Heima Network was developed focusing on decentralized identity and privacy solutions. Building on this foundation, Heima expanded its scope to address cross-chain asset management and multi-chain interoperability.
Read more on HEI →Oasys is a public blockchain protocol specifically tailored for the gaming industry. Its unique multi-layered architecture combines both public and private blockchain technologies to provide a seamless, fast, and gas-free gaming experience. This innovative design enables Oasys to efficiently manage the high transaction volumes commonly found in gaming environments while minimizing the risk of node crashes, which is a frequent issue in many other blockchains.
Read more on OAS →