Compare GameSwift (GSWIFT) vs Quack AI (Q) Price & Performance
Price performance (Past 24H)
Key statistics
Key statistics
GameSwift vs Quack AI — how do they compare? GameSwift trades at Rp31.18 (market cap Rp12,61M, Rp958,63jt 24h volume), while Quack AI trades at Rp387.15 (market cap Rp1,68T, Rp37,82M 24h volume). The key difference: Quack AI is far larger — about 133227.6× GameSwift's market cap, and GameSwift's circulating supply is 360,8M / 1,4B GSWIFT (26%) versus 4,3B / 10B Q (44%) for Quack AI. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold GameSwift for 9 Days and Quack AI for 3 Days on average.
| GSWIFT | Q | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | Rp12,61M | Rp1,68T |
Volume (24h) | Rp958,63jt | Rp37,82M |
Circulating Supply | 360,8M / 1,4B GSWIFT (26%) | 4,3B / 10B Q (44%) |
Typical Hold Time | 9 Days | 3 Days |
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
GameSwift (GSWIFT) shows limited market activity with a modest market cap of Rp12.61M and low circulating supply of 360,800 tokens (26% of max supply). The token exhibits minimal trading volume and liquidity, with a short average hold time of 9 days indicating speculative trading patterns. No recent protocol updates or significant ecosystem developments have been observed, suggesting limited network activity.
Overall outlook remains cautious due to extremely low liquidity and market depth. Key opportunity lies in potential future ecosystem growth, while major risks include high volatility from low trading volume, regulatory uncertainty, and limited adoption. Investors should be aware this is a micro-cap token with elevated risk profile.
Quack AI (Q) trades at Rp388.671 with a market cap of Rp1.7T, showing neutral technical signals overall. The token has a circulating supply of 4.3M out of 10M max supply (44% circulation rate) with an average hold time of 3 days. Moving averages indicate bullish momentum while oscillators remain neutral. Recent technical analysis shows the price is near the pivot point of Rp393 with support at Rp377 and resistance at Rp406.
The outlook remains balanced with technical indicators showing mixed signals. Key opportunities include the token's relatively low circulation rate suggesting potential future supply constraints. Major risks include typical crypto volatility and the neutral market sentiment that could lead to sideways trading in the short term.
Investor sentiment on Pluang
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
Investor sentiment on Pluang
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
No sentiment data available yet.
About GameSwift
GameSwift is a modular blockchain network with a Gaming-optimized Layer 1 and zkEVM rollups for specific games. It offers a secure infrastructure for developers to deploy dApps while ensuring cross-network compatibility. GameSwift aims to be the preferred blockchain for game studios, accessible to both web3 and web2 gamers, and to create the world’s largest web3 Gaming community.
Read more on GSWIFT →About Quack AI
Quack AI is a governance infrastructure that uses modular AI agents to automate and scale decision-making for DAOs and Web3 protocols. It analyzes proposals, delegates voting, and streamlines execution to improve participation and efficiency. Built with cross-chain standards like x402, it enables gasless, policy-aware governance actions across networks such as BNB Chain and Arbitrum.
Read more on Q →
