Compare GameSwift (GSWIFT) vs OpenLedger (OPEN) Price & Performance
Price performance (Past 24H)
Key statistics
Key statistics
GameSwift vs OpenLedger — how do they compare? GameSwift trades at Rp31.18 (market cap Rp12,61M, Rp958,63jt 24h volume), while OpenLedger trades at Rp3,337 (market cap Rp1,06T, Rp133,89M 24h volume). The key difference: OpenLedger is far larger — about 84060.3× GameSwift's market cap, and GameSwift's circulating supply is 360,8M / 1,4B GSWIFT (26%) versus 319M / 1B OPEN (32%) for OpenLedger. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold GameSwift for 9 Days and OpenLedger for 23 Days on average.
| GSWIFT | OPEN | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | Rp12,61M | Rp1,06T |
Volume (24h) | Rp958,63jt | Rp133,89M |
Circulating Supply | 360,8M / 1,4B GSWIFT (26%) | 319M / 1B OPEN (32%) |
Typical Hold Time | 9 Days | 23 Days |
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
GameSwift shows a modest market cap of Rp12.61M with a circulating supply of 360.8jt tokens (26% of max supply). The token exhibits a relatively short average hold time of 9 days, suggesting active trading. Current technical positioning requires price data for trend analysis, while fundamental metrics indicate early-stage token distribution with limited network adoption metrics available.
Overall outlook remains speculative given the token's small market cap and limited ecosystem visibility. Key opportunities include potential growth from increased adoption, while major risks include low liquidity, high volatility typical of micro-cap tokens, and limited exchange support. Investors should monitor for protocol developments and exchange listings.
OpenLedger (OPEN) is trading at Rp3,545 with a market cap of Rp1.15 trillion, showing a bullish technical signal from moving averages but neutral oscillators. The token's circulating supply is 32% of its 1 million max supply, with an average hold time of 23 days. Recent on-chain activity indicates steady network usage, though no major protocol upgrades were reported in the past month.
Overall outlook is cautiously optimistic due to strong technical momentum, but risks include low liquidity and regulatory uncertainty. Key opportunities lie in potential ecosystem growth, while major risks involve high volatility and limited adoption. Investors should monitor support at Rp3,454 and resistance at Rp3,944 for near-term direction.
Investor sentiment on Pluang
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
Investor sentiment on Pluang
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
No sentiment data available yet.
About GameSwift
GameSwift is a modular blockchain network with a Gaming-optimized Layer 1 and zkEVM rollups for specific games. It offers a secure infrastructure for developers to deploy dApps while ensuring cross-network compatibility. GameSwift aims to be the preferred blockchain for game studios, accessible to both web3 and web2 gamers, and to create the world’s largest web3 Gaming community.
Read more on GSWIFT →About OpenLedger
OpenLedger is an AI blockchain that unlocks liquidity for monetizing data, models, applications, and agents. It facilitates the training, deployment, and on-chain tracking of specialized AI models and data, addressing critical challenges related to transparency, attribution, and verifiability in AI.
Read more on OPEN →
