Grass vs Quack AI — how do they compare? Grass trades at Rp5,827 (market cap Rp1,43T, Rp243,08M 24h volume), while Quack AI trades at Rp388.25 (market cap Rp1,69T, Rp45,13M 24h volume). The key difference: Quack AI is the larger of the two by market cap, and Quack AI's supply is capped (4,3B / 10B Q (44%)) while Grass's keeps growing. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Grass for 10 Days and Quack AI for 3 Days on average.
| GRASS | Q | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | Rp1,43T | Rp1,69T |
Volume (24h) | Rp243,08M | Rp45,13M |
Circulating Supply | 243,9M GRASS | 4,3B / 10B Q (44%) |
Typical Hold Time | 10 Days | 3 Days |
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
Grass is developing the first open, internet-scale web crawl, powered by over 3 million user-run nodes that gather petabytes of data for AI models. By creating the first user-owned knowledge graph of the internet, Grass aims to challenge the few corporations that currently dominate full-scale web crawling.
Read more on GRASS →Quack AI is a governance infrastructure that uses modular AI agents to automate and scale decision-making for DAOs and Web3 protocols. It analyzes proposals, delegates voting, and streamlines execution to improve participation and efficiency. Built with cross-chain standards like x402, it enables gasless, policy-aware governance actions across networks such as BNB Chain and Arbitrum.
Read more on Q →