Compare Fluid (FLUID) vs GameSwift (GSWIFT) Price & Performance
Price performance (Past 24H)
Key statistics
Key statistics
Fluid vs GameSwift — how do they compare? Fluid trades at Rp18,555 (market cap Rp1,46T, Rp33,02M 24h volume), while GameSwift trades at Rp31.18 (market cap Rp12,61M, Rp958,63jt 24h volume). The key difference: Fluid is far larger — about 115781.1× GameSwift's market cap, and GameSwift's supply is capped (360,8M / 1,4B GSWIFT (26%)) while Fluid's keeps growing. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Fluid for 9 Days and GameSwift for 9 Days on average.
| FLUID | GSWIFT | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | Rp1,46T | Rp12,61M |
Volume (24h) | Rp33,02M | Rp958,63jt |
Circulating Supply | 78,7M FLUID | 360,8M / 1,4B GSWIFT (26%) |
Typical Hold Time | 9 Days | 9 Days |
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Fluid is trading at Rp18,589 with a market cap of Rp1.47 trillion, showing a bearish technical signal driven by moving averages. Key support lies at Rp16,528 with resistance at Rp18,822. No major protocol updates or ecosystem developments were noted recently.
Overall outlook is cautious due to bearish technicals and neutral fundamentals. Opportunities include potential rebounds from support levels, but risks involve high volatility and limited liquidity. Investors should monitor for any ecosystem growth or regulatory news.
GameSwift (GSWIFT) exhibits a micro-cap profile with a market cap of Rp12.61M and a circulating supply of 360.8jt tokens. The token shows limited market activity with a circulation rate of 26% and a short average hold time of 9 days, indicating speculative trading. No recent price or volume data is available, and the absence of major protocol updates or ecosystem developments suggests low network activity. The asset's technical and fundamental metrics point to early-stage characteristics with minimal market penetration.
Overall outlook remains cautious due to extreme illiquidity and high volatility risks inherent in micro-cap tokens. Key opportunities include potential ecosystem growth if development resumes, but major risks involve low exchange liquidity, regulatory uncertainty for small projects, and susceptibility to price manipulation. Investors should prioritize deep due diligence given the sparse data availability.
About Fluid
Fluid Protocol (formerly known as Instadapp) is a next-generation DeFi platform that reDeFined capital efficiency through its seamless integration of smart collateral management, innovative Vault borrowing, and an embedded DEX. Recently rebranded to align with its vision of being the “Liquidity Layer of DeFi,” Fluid is launching a strategic growth initiative powered by restructured tokenomics, algorithmic buybacks, and a one-time allocation from its treasury to fuel expansion. With a smooth 1:1 token migration from INST to FLUID and zero dilution for holders, the protocol is poised to scale rapidly. Fluid aims to become the leading DEX on Ethereum by volume and achieve a market footprint of $10 billion.
Read more on FLUID →About GameSwift
GameSwift is a modular blockchain network with a Gaming-optimized Layer 1 and zkEVM rollups for specific games. It offers a secure infrastructure for developers to deploy dApps while ensuring cross-network compatibility. GameSwift aims to be the preferred blockchain for game studios, accessible to both web3 and web2 gamers, and to create the world’s largest web3 Gaming community.
Read more on GSWIFT →
