Chainflip vs Stader — how do they compare? Chainflip trades at Rp4,965 (market cap --, Rp2,69M 24h volume), while Stader trades at Rp2,002 (market cap Rp141,52M, Rp19,7M 24h volume). The key difference: Stader's supply is capped (70,8M / 120M SD (59%)) while Chainflip's keeps growing, and Stader is more actively traded (Rp19,7M versus Rp2,69M). Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Chainflip for 17 Days and Stader for 11 Days on average.
| FLIP | SD | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | -- | Rp141,52M |
Volume (24h) | Rp2,69M | Rp19,7M |
Circulating Supply | -- | 70,8M / 120M SD (59%) |
Typical Hold Time | 17 Days | 11 Days |
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
Chainflip is transforming the decentralized exchange landscape by enabling seamless, low-slippage swaps between major blockchains. Unlike traditional methods, Chainflip removes the need for wrapped tokens or specialized wallets, making cross-chain transactions more accessible and user-friendly. At its core, Chainflip utilizes a Just-In-Time (JIT) Automated Market Maker (AMM) to facilitate efficient and secure trades.
Read more on FLIP →Stader is developing staking middleware for various PoS networks, offering modular smart contracts for third-party solutions. In the short term, it will launch contracts on blockchains like Terra and Ethereum to support yield farming and Gaming. Long-term, Stader will encourage third-party staking applications on its platform.
Read more on SD →