Solana Name Service vs WalletConnect — how do they compare? Solana Name Service trades at Rp386.29 (market cap Rp380,92M, Rp111,56M 24h volume), while WalletConnect trades at Rp783.41 (market cap Rp325,23M, Rp187,65M 24h volume). The key difference: Solana Name Service is the larger of the two by market cap, and WalletConnect's supply is capped (417,2M / 1B WCT (42%)) while Solana Name Service's keeps growing. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Solana Name Service for 33 Days and WalletConnect for 22 Days on average.
| FIDA | WCT | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | Rp380,92M | Rp325,23M |
Volume (24h) | Rp111,56M | Rp187,65M |
Circulating Supply | 990,9M FIDA | 417,2M / 1B WCT (42%) |
Typical Hold Time | 33 Days | 22 Days |
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
Bonfida is known as a leading infrastructure developer on Solana. They have earned this reputation through their contributions to the ecosystem, providing services and products that support its growth. Some of their contributions include creating the Asset Agnostic Orderbook (AOB) as a new Serum Core engine, simplifying transactions with Solana Name Service, and introducing the first perpetual swap on Solana called Audaces. As a result, their developers are highly respected within the Solana ecosystem.
Read more on FIDA →WalletConnect Network is a decentralized platform that connects users to blockchain apps with ease and security. Powered by the WCT token, it supports a growing ecosystem and launches on Optimism for fast, secure performance.
Read more on WCT →