Solana Name Service vs Marlin — how do they compare? Solana Name Service trades at Rp311.3 (market cap Rp307,83M, Rp87,33M 24h volume), while Marlin trades at Rp14.6 (market cap Rp151,7M, Rp47,86M 24h volume). The key difference: Solana Name Service is far larger — about 2× Marlin's market cap, and Solana Name Service's circulating supply is 990,9M FIDA versus 8,2B POND for Marlin. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Solana Name Service for 34 Days and Marlin for 34 Days on average.
| FIDA | POND | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | Rp307,83M | Rp151,7M |
Volume (24h) | Rp87,33M | Rp47,86M |
Circulating Supply | 990,9M FIDA | 8,2B POND |
Typical Hold Time | 34 Days | 34 Days |
Bonfida is known as a leading infrastructure developer on Solana. They have earned this reputation through their contributions to the ecosystem, providing services and products that support its growth. Some of their contributions include creating the Asset Agnostic Orderbook (AOB) as a new Serum Core engine, simplifying transactions with Solana Name Service, and introducing the first perpetual swap on Solana called Audaces. As a result, their developers are highly respected within the Solana ecosystem.
Read more on FIDA →POND is an Ethereum token that powers Marlin, an open protocol providing a high-performance programmable DeFi and web3 network infrastructure. POND can be used to delegate to Marlin nodes and as a reward for operating the relay network correctly.
Read more on POND →