Investment
Features
FeesSafety
Academy
More
Pluang+

Compare Caldera (ERA) vs GameSwift (GSWIFT) Price & Performance

Price performance (Past 24H)

Key statistics

Caldera vs GameSwift — how do they compare? Caldera trades at Rp1,080 (market cap Rp161,03M, Rp77,63M 24h volume), while GameSwift trades at Rp31.18 (market cap Rp12,61M, Rp958,63jt 24h volume). The key difference: Caldera is far larger — about 12.8× GameSwift's market cap, and Caldera's circulating supply is 148,5M / 1B ERA (15%) versus 360,8M / 1,4B GSWIFT (26%) for GameSwift. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Caldera for 12 Days and GameSwift for 9 Days on average.

ERAGSWIFT
Market Cap
Rp161,03MRp12,61M
Volume (24h)
Rp77,63MRp958,63jt
Circulating Supply
148,5M / 1B ERA (15%)360,8M / 1,4B GSWIFT (26%)
Typical Hold Time
12 Days9 Days

Aura AI Summary

Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice

Caldera

Caldera (ERA) is currently trading at Rp1,123 with a bearish technical signal, showing weakness below key resistance levels. The token faces selling pressure with moving averages indicating a downtrend, though oscillators suggest potential stabilization. With only 15% of the 1 million max supply in circulation and a short 12-day average hold time, the token shows limited distribution depth. Recent ecosystem activity appears minimal with no major protocol updates reported.

Overall outlook remains cautious with technical weakness dominating. Key opportunities include potential oversold bounce near support levels, while major risks include low liquidity, limited adoption metrics, and the bearish technical structure. Investors should monitor for any protocol developments that could drive fundamental value.

GameSwift

GameSwift (GSWIFT) shows limited market activity with a modest market cap of Rp12.61M and low circulating supply of 360,800 tokens (26% of max supply). The token exhibits minimal trading volume and liquidity, with a short average hold time of 9 days indicating speculative trading patterns. No recent protocol updates or significant ecosystem developments have been observed, suggesting limited network activity.

Overall outlook remains cautious due to extremely low liquidity and market depth. Key opportunity lies in potential future ecosystem growth, while major risks include high volatility from low trading volume, regulatory uncertainty, and limited adoption. Investors should be aware this is a micro-cap token with elevated risk profile.

Investor sentiment on Pluang

What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days

ERA
100% Buy0% Sell
Avg holding period · 12 Days
GSWIFT

No sentiment data available yet.

About Caldera

Caldera is a rollup platform on Ethereum that enables horizontal scaling and interoperability between rollups. It allows projects to launch customizable rollups while maintaining Ethereum’s security and decentralization.

Read more on ERA

About GameSwift

GameSwift is a modular blockchain network with a Gaming-optimized Layer 1 and zkEVM rollups for specific games. It offers a secure infrastructure for developers to deploy dApps while ensuring cross-network compatibility. GameSwift aims to be the preferred blockchain for game studios, accessible to both web3 and web2 gamers, and to create the world’s largest web3 Gaming community.

Read more on GSWIFT