Ethereum Name Service vs Walrus — how do they compare? Ethereum Name Service trades at Rp72,548 (market cap Rp3,04T, Rp99,79M 24h volume), while Walrus trades at Rp371.39 (market cap Rp942,07M, Rp53,28M 24h volume). The key difference: Ethereum Name Service is far larger — about 3226.9× Walrus's market cap, and Walrus's supply is capped (2,5B / 5B WAL (51%)) while Ethereum Name Service's keeps growing. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Ethereum Name Service for 31 Days and Walrus for 24 Days on average.
| ENS | WAL | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | Rp3,04T | Rp942,07M |
Volume (24h) | Rp99,79M | Rp53,28M |
Circulating Supply | 42M ENS | 2,5B / 5B WAL (51%) |
Typical Hold Time | 31 Days | 24 Days |
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
Ethereum Name Service is a distributed, open, and extensible naming system based on the Ethereum blockchain. ENS is the governance token used to govern the protocol and influence decisions on pricing its .eth addresses and the price oracle. Token holders can also delegate their tokens to the DAO for voting.
Read more on ENS →Walrus is a decentralized data storage protocol and application development platform that enables apps to manage large data files and rich media content like videos, images, and audio. Built on Sui, it allows for the handling of both on-chain and off-chain data using Move-based smart contracts. Developed by Mysten Labs, Walrus is the first network that permits storage of any data size on-chain at scale. This capability enhances how Web3 projects use their data, supporting the development of diverse on-chain businesses.
Read more on WAL →