Ethereum Name Service vs SuperVerse — how do they compare? Ethereum Name Service trades at Rp72,548 (market cap Rp3,04T, Rp99,79M 24h volume), while SuperVerse trades at Rp1,523 (market cap Rp973,87M, Rp38,28M 24h volume). The key difference: Ethereum Name Service is far larger — about 3121.6× SuperVerse's market cap, and SuperVerse's supply is capped (640,2M / 1.000M SUPER (65%)) while Ethereum Name Service's keeps growing. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Ethereum Name Service for 31 Days and SuperVerse for 28 Days on average.
| ENS | SUPER | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | Rp3,04T | Rp973,87M |
Volume (24h) | Rp99,79M | Rp38,28M |
Circulating Supply | 42M ENS | 640,2M / 1.000M SUPER (65%) |
Typical Hold Time | 31 Days | 28 Days |
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
Ethereum Name Service is a distributed, open, and extensible naming system based on the Ethereum blockchain. ENS is the governance token used to govern the protocol and influence decisions on pricing its .eth addresses and the price oracle. Token holders can also delegate their tokens to the DAO for voting.
Read more on ENS →SuperVerse is a cross-chain decentralized finance (DeFi) protocol built to facilitate the launching of new non-fungible tokens (NFTs) without the need for programming. A marketplace and an innovative set of tools allow any project to deploy a farm with its own rules. The SUPER token gives users access to a range of opportunities in the crypto space through SUPERVERSE, Partner Video Games and frequent NFT drops.
Read more on SUPER →