Compare Ethereum Name Service (ENS) vs QuickSwap (New) (QUICK) Price & Performance
Price performance (Past 24H)
Key statistics
Key statistics
Ethereum Name Service vs QuickSwap (New) — how do they compare? Ethereum Name Service trades at Rp79,121 (market cap Rp3,25T, Rp273,05M 24h volume), while QuickSwap (New) trades at Rp141.05 (market cap Rp93,14M, Rp6,22M 24h volume). The key difference: Ethereum Name Service is far larger — about 34893.7× QuickSwap (New)'s market cap, and QuickSwap (New)'s supply is capped (666,3M / 1B QUICK (67%)) while Ethereum Name Service's keeps growing. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Ethereum Name Service for 30 Days and QuickSwap (New) for 21 Days on average.
| ENS | QUICK | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | Rp3,25T | Rp93,14M |
Volume (24h) | Rp273,05M | Rp6,22M |
Circulating Supply | 40,9M ENS | 666,3M / 1B QUICK (67%) |
Typical Hold Time | 30 Days | 21 Days |
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Ethereum Name Service (ENS) is currently trading at Rp76,082 with a market cap of Rp3.14T, showing a bearish technical signal driven by moving averages. The asset is testing support near Rp72,780–73,242, with oscillators neutral. No major protocol upgrades or ecosystem expansions were reported recently, keeping fundamental activity subdued. Trading volume and network metrics indicate moderate interest amid broader market caution.
Overall outlook remains cautious due to bearish technicals and lack of catalysts. Key opportunities include potential rebounds from support zones if buying interest emerges. Major risks involve high volatility, low liquidity depth, and regulatory uncertainty for naming services. Investors should monitor key support breaks for downside confirmation.
QuickSwap is currently trading at Rp137.742 with a market cap of Rp91.81M, showing bearish technical signals overall despite bullish oscillators. The token faces resistance at Rp140-144 with support at Rp130-135. With 67% of the 1M max supply in circulation and average hold time of 21 days, the asset shows moderate network participation.
Overall outlook remains cautious due to bearish technical indicators and limited recent developments. Key opportunities include potential bounce from support levels, while risks involve low liquidity and crypto market volatility. Investors should monitor trading volume and protocol updates closely.
Investor sentiment on Pluang
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
Investor sentiment on Pluang
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
About Ethereum Name Service
Ethereum Name Service is a distributed, open, and extensible naming system based on the Ethereum blockchain. ENS is the governance token used to govern the protocol and influence decisions on pricing its .eth addresses and the price oracle. Token holders can also delegate their tokens to the DAO for voting.
Read more on ENS →About QuickSwap (New)
QuickSwap is the leading DEX on all Polygon chains, including Polygon PoS, Polygon zkEVM, X Layer, Immutable zkEVM, and more. $QUICK is the native token powering the DragonFi ecosystem. It can be used for staking, voting in governance, futures trading, and earning rewards in the token through LPing.
Read more on QUICK →
