Compare Ethereum Name Service (ENS) vs Quack AI (Q) Price & Performance
Price performance (Past 24H)
Key statistics
Key statistics
Ethereum Name Service vs Quack AI — how do they compare? Ethereum Name Service trades at Rp72,292 (market cap Rp3T, Rp95,15M 24h volume), while Quack AI trades at Rp384.47 (market cap Rp1,66T, Rp40,56M 24h volume). The key difference: Ethereum Name Service is the larger of the two by market cap, and Quack AI's supply is capped (4,3B / 10B Q (44%)) while Ethereum Name Service's keeps growing. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Ethereum Name Service for 31 Days and Quack AI for 3 Days on average.
| ENS | Q | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | Rp3T | Rp1,66T |
Volume (24h) | Rp95,15M | Rp40,56M |
Circulating Supply | 42M ENS | 4,3B / 10B Q (44%) |
Typical Hold Time | 31 Days | 3 Days |
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Ethereum Name Service (ENS) is currently trading at Rp72,548 with a market cap of Rp3.05T, showing bearish technical signals overall despite oscillators indicating some bullish momentum. The token faces selling pressure with moving averages strongly bearish (0 buy, 13 sell signals). Key support levels cluster around Rp72,216-72,465, while resistance sits at Rp72,714-72,963. Recent network activity shows average hold time of 31 days, suggesting moderate investor conviction amid current market conditions.
Overall outlook remains cautious with technical weakness dominating. Key opportunity lies in oversold RSI conditions (RSI_6 at 7.78, RSI_12 at 23.46) suggesting potential rebound. Major risks include continued bearish momentum, low trading volumes, and crypto market volatility. Investors should monitor support level breaks and broader Ethereum ecosystem developments for directional cues.
Quack AI (Q) trades at Rp388.671 with a market cap of Rp1.7T, showing neutral technical signals overall. The token has a circulating supply of 4.3M out of 10M max supply (44% circulation rate) with an average hold time of 3 days. Moving averages indicate bullish momentum while oscillators remain neutral. Recent technical analysis shows the price is near the pivot point of Rp393 with support at Rp377 and resistance at Rp406.
The outlook remains balanced with technical indicators showing mixed signals. Key opportunities include the token's relatively low circulation rate suggesting potential future supply constraints. Major risks include typical crypto volatility and the neutral market sentiment that could lead to sideways trading in the short term.
Investor sentiment on Pluang
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
Investor sentiment on Pluang
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
About Ethereum Name Service
Ethereum Name Service is a distributed, open, and extensible naming system based on the Ethereum blockchain. ENS is the governance token used to govern the protocol and influence decisions on pricing its .eth addresses and the price oracle. Token holders can also delegate their tokens to the DAO for voting.
Read more on ENS →About Quack AI
Quack AI is a governance infrastructure that uses modular AI agents to automate and scale decision-making for DAOs and Web3 protocols. It analyzes proposals, delegates voting, and streamlines execution to improve participation and efficiency. Built with cross-chain standards like x402, it enables gasless, policy-aware governance actions across networks such as BNB Chain and Arbitrum.
Read more on Q →
