Ethereum Name Service vs Haedal Protocol — how do they compare? Ethereum Name Service trades at Rp72,292 (market cap Rp3,02T, Rp108,43M 24h volume), while Haedal Protocol trades at Rp293.21 (market cap Rp141,55M, Rp30,26M 24h volume). The key difference: Ethereum Name Service is far larger — about 21335.2× Haedal Protocol's market cap, and Haedal Protocol's supply is capped (483,3M / 1B HAEDAL (49%)) while Ethereum Name Service's keeps growing. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Ethereum Name Service for 31 Days and Haedal Protocol for 15 Days on average.
| ENS | HAEDAL | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | Rp3,02T | Rp141,55M |
Volume (24h) | Rp108,43M | Rp30,26M |
Circulating Supply | 42M ENS | 483,3M / 1B HAEDAL (49%) |
Typical Hold Time | 31 Days | 15 Days |
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Ethereum Name Service (ENS) is currently trading at Rp72,548 with a market cap of Rp3.05T, showing bearish technical signals overall despite oscillators indicating some bullish momentum. The token faces selling pressure with moving averages strongly bearish (0 buy, 13 sell signals). Key support levels cluster around Rp72,216-72,465, while resistance sits at Rp72,714-72,963. Recent network activity shows average hold time of 31 days, suggesting moderate investor conviction amid current market conditions.
Overall outlook remains cautious with technical weakness dominating. Key opportunity lies in oversold RSI conditions (RSI_6 at 7.78, RSI_12 at 23.46) suggesting potential rebound. Major risks include continued bearish momentum, low trading volumes, and crypto market volatility. Investors should monitor support level breaks and broader Ethereum ecosystem developments for directional cues.
Haedal Protocol currently trades at Rp288.18 with a market cap of Rp139.43M, showing bearish technical signals from moving averages while oscillators remain neutral. The token has 49% circulating supply with an average hold time of 15 days. Current price sits near the pivot point of Rp288, with immediate support at Rp283 and resistance at Rp292. No major protocol updates or ecosystem developments were identified in recent analysis.
Overall outlook remains cautious with bearish technical momentum outweighing neutral oscillators. Key opportunity lies in potential bounce from support levels, while major risks include low liquidity and limited market depth. Investors should monitor for any protocol developments that could drive adoption.
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
Ethereum Name Service is a distributed, open, and extensible naming system based on the Ethereum blockchain. ENS is the governance token used to govern the protocol and influence decisions on pricing its .eth addresses and the price oracle. Token holders can also delegate their tokens to the DAO for voting.
Read more on ENS →Haedal is a leading liquid staking protocol built specifically on the Sui blockchain. It provides a reliable infrastructure that enables users to stake their SUI and Walrus tokens with validators, allowing them to earn ongoing consensus rewards. Additionally, users can unlock liquidity in the form of liquid staking tokens (LST), which can be utilized across decentralized finance (DeFi) applications. Haedal's goal is to become the primary platform for staking and earning within the Sui ecosystem.
Read more on HAEDAL →