Polkadot vs io.net — how do they compare? Polkadot trades at Rp15,185 (market cap Rp25,61T, Rp1,4T 24h volume), while io.net trades at Rp2,868 (market cap Rp1,05T, Rp450,01M 24h volume). The key difference: Polkadot is far larger — about 24.4× io.net's market cap, and Polkadot's circulating supply is 1,7B / 2,1B DOT (81%) versus 365,5M / 800M IO (46%) for io.net. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Polkadot for 116 Days and io.net for 33 Days on average.
| DOT | IO | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | Rp25,61T | Rp1,05T |
Volume (24h) | Rp1,4T | Rp450,01M |
Circulating Supply | 1,7B / 2,1B DOT (81%) | 365,5M / 800M IO (46%) |
Typical Hold Time | 116 Days | 33 Days |
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Polkadot is currently trading at Rp15,185 with a market cap of Rp25.61T, showing bearish technical signals with moving averages indicating strong selling pressure. The token is trading near key support levels with neutral oscillators suggesting potential consolidation. Current circulation rate stands at 81% with average hold time of 116 days, indicating moderate holding patterns among investors.
Overall outlook remains cautious with technical indicators favoring bearish momentum. Key opportunity lies in potential bounce from support levels, while major risks include continued selling pressure and broader crypto market volatility. Investors should monitor network adoption metrics and protocol developments for fundamental catalysts.
IO is trading at Rp2,881 with a market cap of Rp1.03 trillion, showing bearish technical signals from moving averages despite neutral oscillators. The token's circulating supply is 365.5 million out of 800 million, with a 46% circulation rate and average hold time of 33 days. Recent trading shows support at Rp2,680 and resistance at Rp3,022, with RSI_6 indicating potential oversold conditions at 26.80 (CoinGecko, 2026-05-28).
Overall outlook remains cautious due to bearish momentum, though oversold RSI may present short-term opportunities. Major risks include high volatility, regulatory uncertainty in crypto markets, and limited liquidity depth. Investors should monitor network adoption and upcoming protocol updates for fundamental catalysts.
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
No sentiment data available yet.
Latest headlines on both assets
A crypto asset founded by Gavin Wood (a co-founder of Ethereum) alongside co-founders Peter Czaban and Robert Habermeier in 2016. It was finally launched in 2020 with the goal of incentivizing the global network of computers to use blockchain for its operation which users can launch and operate their own blockchains system.
Read more on DOT →io.net, formerly known as ANTBIT, leverages a decentralized computing network powered by Solana and Aptos to provide machine learning engineers with access to distributed cloud clusters. It aims to address challenges like limited availability, poor choice, and high costs associated with accessing GPUs in the public cloud.
Read more on IO →