Compare Intiland Development Tbk. (DILD) vs PAM Mineral Tbk. (NICL) Price & Performance
Price performance (Past 24H)
Key statistics
Key statistics
Intiland Development Tbk. vs PAM Mineral Tbk. — how do they compare? Intiland Development Tbk. trades at Rp114 (market cap 1.2T, 13.47M 24h volume), while PAM Mineral Tbk. trades at Rp460 (market cap 4.93T, 12.67M 24h volume). The key difference: PAM Mineral Tbk. is far larger — about 4.1× Intiland Development Tbk.'s market cap, and Intiland Development Tbk. is more actively traded (13.47M versus 12.67M). Which is the better fit depends on your goals.
| DILD | NICL | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | 1.2T | 4.93T |
Volume | 13.47M | 12.67M |
Lot | 134.73K | 126.71K |
Turnover | 1.54B | 5.86B |
Average Price | 114.29 | 462.21 |
Value | 1.54B | 5.86B |
Indicative Equilibrium Price | 114 | 460 |
Indicative Equilibrium Volume | 146 | 2.12K |
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Top news
Latest headlines on both assets
Top news
Latest headlines on both assets
About Intiland Development Tbk.
PT Intiland Development Tbk formerly Dharmala Intiland, controlled by the Gondokusumo family, was established in 1983 as the property arm of the Dharmala Group. The company is basically a real estate developer with its principal asset being the 240-hectare Grande Family Estate in Surabaya.
Read more on DILD →About PAM Mineral Tbk.
PT PAM Mineral Tbk (the Company) was established on January 15, 2008 based on Notarial Deed No. 32 of Edison Jingga, S.H., notary in Jakarta. The Company operates in two operational areas, namely in Southeast Sulawesi, Lameruru Village, Langgikima District, North Konawe Regency and Laroenai Village, Bungku Pesisir District, Central Sulawesi.
Read more on NICL →
