DAR Open Network vs GameSwift — how do they compare? DAR Open Network trades at Rp82.16 (market cap Rp68,87M, Rp65,81M 24h volume), while GameSwift trades at Rp31.18 (market cap Rp12,61M, Rp958,63jt 24h volume). The key difference: DAR Open Network is far larger — about 5.5× GameSwift's market cap, and DAR Open Network's circulating supply is 743,5M / 800M D (93%) versus 360,8M / 1,4B GSWIFT (26%) for GameSwift. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold DAR Open Network for 24 Days and GameSwift for 9 Days on average.
| D | GSWIFT | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | Rp68,87M | Rp12,61M |
Volume (24h) | Rp65,81M | Rp958,63jt |
Circulating Supply | 743,5M / 800M D (93%) | 360,8M / 1,4B GSWIFT (26%) |
Typical Hold Time | 24 Days | 9 Days |
The DAR Open Network is designed as an open framework intended to transform Web3 applications through advanced technologies. Serving as a foundational layer on the blockchain, it seeks to enable a community-driven ecosystem where applications can flourish on shared infrastructure, resources, and user interactions.
Read more on D →GameSwift is a modular blockchain network with a Gaming-optimized Layer 1 and zkEVM rollups for specific games. It offers a secure infrastructure for developers to deploy dApps while ensuring cross-network compatibility. GameSwift aims to be the preferred blockchain for game studios, accessible to both web3 and web2 gamers, and to create the world’s largest web3 Gaming community.
Read more on GSWIFT →