CyberConnect vs Puffer — how do they compare? CyberConnect trades at Rp6,240 (market cap Rp443,88M, Rp162,2M 24h volume), while Puffer trades at Rp245.11 (market cap Rp118,14M, Rp44,58M 24h volume). The key difference: CyberConnect is far larger — about 3.8× Puffer's market cap, and CyberConnect's circulating supply is 71,1M / 100M CYBER (72%) versus 483,8M / 1B PUFFER (49%) for Puffer. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold CyberConnect for 30 Days and Puffer for 11 Days on average.
| CYBER | PUFFER | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | Rp443,88M | Rp118,14M |
Volume (24h) | Rp162,2M | Rp44,58M |
Circulating Supply | 71,1M / 100M CYBER (72%) | 483,8M / 1B PUFFER (49%) |
Typical Hold Time | 30 Days | 11 Days |
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
No sentiment data available yet.
CyberConnect is web3’s earliest and biggest social network that enables developers to create social applications utilizing ERC-4337/Account Abstraction, empowering users to own their digital identity, content, connections, and interactions.
Read more on CYBER →Puffer is a decentralized platform aimed at improving the scalability and security of Ethereum through innovative restaking and rollup solutions. The ecosystem features the Puffer LRT (Liquid Restaking Token) along with the UniFi suite of products, which includes UniFi AVS and UniFi Based Rollup. The native governance token, PUFFER, is used to manage key protocol parameters within the Puffer and UniFi ecosystem. This includes selecting guardians and restaking operators, curating supported AVSs, overseeing fee structures, whitelisting new rollups for AVS support, and managing ecosystem rewards and treasury funds.
Read more on PUFFER →