Compare Ciputra Development Tbk (CTRA) vs PAM Mineral Tbk. (NICL) Price & Performance
Price performance (Past 24H)
Key statistics
Key statistics
Ciputra Development Tbk vs PAM Mineral Tbk. — how do they compare? Ciputra Development Tbk trades at Rp575 (market cap 10.38T, 6.06M 24h volume), while PAM Mineral Tbk. trades at Rp510 (market cap 5.42T, 10.35M 24h volume). The key difference: Ciputra Development Tbk is the larger of the two by market cap, and PAM Mineral Tbk. is more actively traded (10.35M versus 6.06M). Which is the better fit depends on your goals.
| CTRA | NICL | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | 10.38T | 5.42T |
Volume | 6.06M | 10.35M |
Lot | 60.59K | 103.52K |
Turnover | 3.48B | 5.26B |
Average Price | 573.72 | 507.79 |
Value | 3.48B | 5.26B |
Indicative Equilibrium Price | 565 | 510 |
Indicative Equilibrium Volume | 819 | 21.7K |
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Top news
Latest headlines on both assets
Top news
Latest headlines on both assets
About Ciputra Development Tbk
PT Ciputra Development Tbk (the Company) was established in the Republic of Indonesia originally under the name PT Citra Habitat Indonesia based on notarial deed No. 22 dated October 22, 1981. Ciputra Developments main interest is in residential and township developments which account for approximately 90% of the companies total sales. The company has nine flagship development projects.
Read more on CTRA →About PAM Mineral Tbk.
PT PAM Mineral Tbk (the Company) was established on January 15, 2008 based on Notarial Deed No. 32 of Edison Jingga, S.H., notary in Jakarta. The Company operates in two operational areas, namely in Southeast Sulawesi, Lameruru Village, Langgikima District, North Konawe Regency and Laroenai Village, Bungku Pesisir District, Central Sulawesi.
Read more on NICL →
