Core vs Ethereum Name Service — how do they compare? Core trades at Rp338.39 (market cap Rp421,46M, Rp53,37M 24h volume), while Ethereum Name Service trades at Rp72,548 (market cap Rp3,05T, Rp116,57M 24h volume). The key difference: Ethereum Name Service is far larger — about 7236.7× Core's market cap, and Core's supply is capped (1,2B / 2,1B CORE (60%)) while Ethereum Name Service's keeps growing. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Core for 39 Days and Ethereum Name Service for 31 Days on average.
| CORE | ENS | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | Rp421,46M | Rp3,05T |
Volume (24h) | Rp53,37M | Rp116,57M |
Circulating Supply | 1,2B / 2,1B CORE (60%) | 42M ENS |
Typical Hold Time | 39 Days | 31 Days |
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
Latest headlines on both assets
CORE (Core) is a layer 1 blockchain that is compatible with the Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM). This means it is capable of executing Ethereum smart contracts and decentralized applications (dApps). The Core network operates using the Satoshi Plus consensus mechanism, which ensures network security through a combination of delegated Bitcoin mining hash and delegated Proof-of-Stake (DPoS). The protocol is supported by its native token, CORE.
Read more on CORE →Ethereum Name Service is a distributed, open, and extensible naming system based on the Ethereum blockchain. ENS is the governance token used to govern the protocol and influence decisions on pricing its .eth addresses and the price oracle. Token holders can also delegate their tokens to the DAO for voting.
Read more on ENS →