Conflux vs Impossible Cloud Network — how do they compare? Conflux trades at Rp774.02 (market cap Rp4,04T, Rp189,28M 24h volume), while Impossible Cloud Network trades at Rp2,857 (market cap Rp720,24M, Rp45,78M 24h volume). The key difference: Conflux is far larger — about 5609.2× Impossible Cloud Network's market cap, and Impossible Cloud Network's supply is capped (253M / 700M ICNT (37%)) while Conflux's keeps growing. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Conflux for 38 Days and Impossible Cloud Network for 3 Days on average.
| CFX | ICNT | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | Rp4,04T | Rp720,24M |
Volume (24h) | Rp189,28M | Rp45,78M |
Circulating Supply | 5,2B CFX | 253M / 700M ICNT (37%) |
Typical Hold Time | 38 Days | 3 Days |
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
Conflux (CFX) is a public layer-1 blockchain that was made to power decentralized applications (dApps), e-commerce, and Web 3.0 infrastructure by being more scalable, decentralized, and secure than existing protocols. Conflux makes it easier to transfer valuable assets by making the process quick, effective, free of network congestion, and with low transaction costs. The platform is based on the Tree-Graph consensus mechanism, and it combines Proof-of-Work (PoW) and Proof-of-Stake (PoS) algorithms to achieve consensus. The protocol uses Turing-complete smart contracts written in Solidity, just like those on Ethereum, and is compatible with the EVM (Ethereum Virtual Machine).
Read more on CFX →Impossible Cloud Network (ICN) is a decentralized infrastructure protocol supporting enterprise-grade cloud services. It provides permissionless access to distributed storage, compute, and networking resources.
Read more on ICNT →