Celer Network vs Obol — how do they compare? Celer Network trades at Rp32.34 (market cap Rp252,2M, Rp37,56M 24h volume), while Obol trades at Rp157.55 (market cap Rp30,1M, Rp51,72M 24h volume). The key difference: Celer Network is far larger — about 8.4× Obol's market cap, and Celer Network's circulating supply is 7,8B / 10B CELR (79%) versus 161,3M / 500M OBOL (33%) for Obol. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Celer Network for 53 Days and Obol for 14 Days on average.
| CELR | OBOL | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | Rp252,2M | Rp30,1M |
Volume (24h) | Rp37,56M | Rp51,72M |
Circulating Supply | 7,8B / 10B CELR (79%) | 161,3M / 500M OBOL (33%) |
Typical Hold Time | 53 Days | 14 Days |
Celer is a blockchain interoperability protocol enabling a one-click user experience accessing tokens, DeFi, GameFi, NFTs, governance, and more across multiple chains. Developers can now build inter-chain-native dApps with efficient liquidity utilization, coherent application logic, and shared states. Celer uses smart contracts that are deployed on each chain paired with the State Guardian Network to enable seamless multi-blockchain interoperability.
Read more on CELR →Obol develops vital technologies that enhance Ethereum's decentralization and security, currently protecting billions in staked ETH. Its Distributed Validators (DVs) offer better uptime, lower risk, and improved performance compared to traditional staking. Using the middleware Charon, DVs enable Ethereum validators to function across multiple operators and machines, featuring threshold signing and distributed key generation for added resilience. The Obol Collective, powered by the OBOL Token, includes the largest decentralized operator ecosystem with major players like Lido and Blockdaemon. The Obol Stack simplifies the deployment of Ethereum nodes and other decentralized infrastructures, advancing the Ethereum economy.
Read more on OBOL →