Celo vs Hashflow — how do they compare? Celo trades at Rp1,303 (market cap Rp787,94M, Rp114,04M 24h volume), while Hashflow trades at Rp155.56 (market cap Rp132,2M, Rp46,1M 24h volume). The key difference: Celo is far larger — about 6× Hashflow's market cap, and Celo's supply is capped (603,8M / 1B CELO (61%)) while Hashflow's keeps growing. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Celo for 83 Days and Hashflow for 35 Days on average.
| CELO | HFT | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | Rp787,94M | Rp132,2M |
Volume (24h) | Rp114,04M | Rp46,1M |
Circulating Supply | 603,8M / 1B CELO (61%) | 849M HFT |
Typical Hold Time | 83 Days | 35 Days |
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
Celo is a blockchain ecosystem focused on increasing cryptocurrency adoption among smartphone users. By using phone numbers as public keys, Celo hopes to introduce the world’s billions of smartphone owners, including those without banking access, to transacting in cryptocurrency. CELO the native token, is a proof-of-stake (PoS) token used for transaction fees, governance participation and related activities.nn
Read more on CELO →Hashflow is a multichain decentralized exchange (DEX) that enables users to trade digital assets on leading blockchains including Ethereum, Arbitrum, Avalanche, BNB Chain, Optimism, and Polygon in just a matter of seconds. Hashflow leverages a request for quote (RFQ) model to provide traders with guaranteed price quotes directly from professional market makers (PMM). Since launching in April 2021, Hashflow has facilitated over $18B in total trade volume, making it a top 10 DEX.
Read more on HFT →