Chainbase vs Newton Protocol — how do they compare? Chainbase trades at Rp1,170 (market cap Rp423,89M, Rp73,8M 24h volume), while Newton Protocol trades at Rp837.55 (market cap Rp244,34M, Rp105,74M 24h volume). The key difference: Chainbase is the larger of the two by market cap, and Chainbase's circulating supply is 362,6M / 1B C (37%) versus 293,6M / 1B NEWT (30%) for Newton Protocol. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Chainbase for 9 Days and Newton Protocol for 24 Days on average.
| C | NEWT | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | Rp423,89M | Rp244,34M |
Volume (24h) | Rp73,8M | Rp105,74M |
Circulating Supply | 362,6M / 1B C (37%) | 293,6M / 1B NEWT (30%) |
Typical Hold Time | 9 Days | 24 Days |
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
No sentiment data available yet.
Latest headlines on both assets
Chainbase is developing the Hyperdata Network for AI, establishing a foundational layer for the DataFi era. This network converts fragmented on-chain signals into structured, verifiable, and AI-ready data, facilitating seamless collaboration among agents, applications, and humans. Chainbase empowers a decentralized data economy where data is treated as capital—composable, monetizable, and accessible to everyone.
Read more on C →The Newton Protocol serves as a verifiable automation layer for on-chain finance, enabling users to delegate complex, cross-chain actions to AI agents while ensuring that each step adheres to user-DeFined guidelines through cryptographic guarantees. It combines smart accounts, such as ERC-4337 and EIP-7702, to allow for detailed delegation, along with trusted execution environment (TEE) attestations and zero-knowledge proofs (ZKPs) to verify the correctness of every off-chain decision. The ultimate aim is to transform automation into a trust-minimized framework, thereby facilitating agentic finance across multiple blockchains.
Read more on NEWT →