Chainbase vs GameSwift — how do they compare? Chainbase trades at Rp1,172 (market cap Rp423,89M, Rp73,8M 24h volume), while GameSwift trades at Rp31.18 (market cap Rp12,61M, Rp958,63jt 24h volume). The key difference: Chainbase is far larger — about 33.6× GameSwift's market cap, and Chainbase's circulating supply is 362,6M / 1B C (37%) versus 360,8M / 1,4B GSWIFT (26%) for GameSwift. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Chainbase for 9 Days and GameSwift for 9 Days on average.
| C | GSWIFT | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | Rp423,89M | Rp12,61M |
Volume (24h) | Rp73,8M | Rp958,63jt |
Circulating Supply | 362,6M / 1B C (37%) | 360,8M / 1,4B GSWIFT (26%) |
Typical Hold Time | 9 Days | 9 Days |
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
No sentiment data available yet.
Latest headlines on both assets
Chainbase is developing the Hyperdata Network for AI, establishing a foundational layer for the DataFi era. This network converts fragmented on-chain signals into structured, verifiable, and AI-ready data, facilitating seamless collaboration among agents, applications, and humans. Chainbase empowers a decentralized data economy where data is treated as capital—composable, monetizable, and accessible to everyone.
Read more on C →GameSwift is a modular blockchain network with a Gaming-optimized Layer 1 and zkEVM rollups for specific games. It offers a secure infrastructure for developers to deploy dApps while ensuring cross-network compatibility. GameSwift aims to be the preferred blockchain for game studios, accessible to both web3 and web2 gamers, and to create the world’s largest web3 Gaming community.
Read more on GSWIFT →