Bubblemaps vs Catizen — how do they compare? Bubblemaps trades at Rp213.44 (market cap Rp148,65M, Rp29,88M 24h volume), while Catizen trades at Rp692.49 (market cap Rp461,89M, Rp66,26M 24h volume). The key difference: Catizen is far larger — about 3.1× Bubblemaps's market cap, and Bubblemaps's circulating supply is 697,1M / 1B BMT (70%) versus 670,1M / 1B CATI (68%) for Catizen. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Bubblemaps for 19 Days and Catizen for 27 Days on average.
| BMT | CATI | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | Rp148,65M | Rp461,89M |
Volume (24h) | Rp29,88M | Rp66,26M |
Circulating Supply | 697,1M / 1B BMT (70%) | 670,1M / 1B CATI (68%) |
Typical Hold Time | 19 Days | 27 Days |
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
No sentiment data available yet.
Bubblemaps raised €6.5M in 2023 and 2024 to accelerate development and expand across ecosystems. The platform is widely used for token research and supply analysis, contributing to on-chain investigations. With over 1M monthly visits, it integrates with services like Pump.fun, Etherscan, and DEX Screener.
Read more on BMT →Catizen is an innovative gaming bot on Telegram that seamlessly integrates the Telegram x TON blockchain. It aims to transform Web3 access by enabling practical mobile payments. By leveraging Telegram's large user base, Catizen aims to become a central hub for Web3 traffic, attracting hundreds of billions of users. Catizen will function as a mini-app center, combining the unique features of Launchpool with short videos and e-commerce. It will attract and engage users through gamification and strategic Play-to-Airdrop initiatives, revolutionizing the way users access and engage with the Web3 ecosystem.
Read more on CATI →