Blast vs Impossible Cloud Network — how do they compare? Blast trades at Rp6.22 (market cap Rp404,74M, Rp811,88M 24h volume), while Impossible Cloud Network trades at Rp2,857 (market cap Rp722,23M, Rp46,41M 24h volume). The key difference: Impossible Cloud Network is the larger of the two by market cap, and Blast's circulating supply is 65,3B / 100B BLAST (66%) versus 253M / 700M ICNT (37%) for Impossible Cloud Network. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Blast for 25 Days and Impossible Cloud Network for 3 Days on average.
| BLAST | ICNT | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | Rp404,74M | Rp722,23M |
Volume (24h) | Rp811,88M | Rp46,41M |
Circulating Supply | 65,3B / 100B BLAST (66%) | 253M / 700M ICNT (37%) |
Typical Hold Time | 25 Days | 3 Days |
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
Blast is the only Ethereum Layer 2 that offers native yield for ETH and stablecoins, sourced from ETH staking and Real-World Asset (RWA) protocols. Unlike other L2s with a default interest rate of 0%, Blast offers 3.4% yield for ETH and 8% for stablecoins. Additionally, Blast provides builders with native yield and gas revenue sharing, allowing for the creation of more competitive products and business models compared to other blockchains.
Read more on BLAST →Impossible Cloud Network (ICN) is a decentralized infrastructure protocol supporting enterprise-grade cloud services. It provides permissionless access to distributed storage, compute, and networking resources.
Read more on ICNT →